hifi.slovanet.sk

[MaBat]

Že lžou, začal otevřeně říkat i Prigožin - ten, co se mu pak stala ta nehoda s tím granátem v tom letadle Rusáci...

O to směšnější jsou pak postavičky jako ty, Zakku, který tomu všemu opravdu věří.

[ipyks]

No neee... je to tam sám Mirek Dušín...

Nášivky nacistů ovládly Kyjev. Noví banderovci vycenili zuby

https://zpravy.aktualne.cz/zahranici/ukrajina-porodila-novodobe-banderovce/r~26048b8a550c11e489110025900fea04/

[MaBat]

https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seznam_neonacistick%C3%BDch_organizac%C3%AD

To budou mít Rusáci ještě hodně práce, to ti teda povím. Ještě, že je máme! Ačkoliv, Rusácko tam má taky slušnej seznam... Co s tím, ipyks?


- Jéšišmarjá, vy tomu opravdu věříte! Pak to nemaj mít ty svině snadný.

[BV]

A je to!

[MaBat]

Přes 40 kusů strategického letectva jednou ranou, to už se bude blbě vysvětlovat i v Rusku

[J]

Nuž - keby súdruhovia pristúpili na prímerie, mohli mať pokoj. Mohli si ďalej veselo lietať, cestovať vlakmi.....


P.S. Fascinuje ma ako sa podaktorí jedinci zasekli a dookola melú o banderovcoch a ukrofašistoch.
To by sa už snáď dalo klasifikovať ako nová diagnóza.

[tatko Tom]

To nie je diagnóza - to je stav.
Hlupáctvo a primitivizmus nie sú liečiteľné.

[J]

A evidentne čím väčší hlupák a úbožiak, tým väčšia túžba to dať o sebe verejne vedieť.
Najnovší žiarivý príklad - putovná výstava ruSSákmi rozstrielanej sanitky po Slovensku. Najprv incident v Žiline a teraz v Martine. Nejaký myslitel na ňu teraz nastriekal hákové kríže a slovo fašisti. Aspoň že sa podpísal.....

[tatko Tom]

Akosi veľa na môj vkus je tých duševných mrzákov. Nemám z toho dobrý pocit.

[tatko Tom]

Ak to nie je fašizmus, povedzte mi, čo to je -
militarizácia mládeže v Rusku: od kolísky až po hrob:

https://x.com/PStyle0ne1/status/1909713412789055661

[J]

Putlerjugend jak vyšitý. Tých do očí bijúcich paralel s fašistickým Nemeckom je tak strašne vela, že to nevidí iba ten čo to nechce vidieť, alebo nemá dostatočné porovnávacie schopnosti.

Pri tom videjku sa mi vynorila spomienka na ranné detstvo ako sme v škôlke šaškovali s plynovými maskami (také tie s dlhým chobotom). Tuším ešte na základke nám merali kvôli maskám velkosť hlavy, ale už si nepamätám že by som ju mal aj reálne na hlave. Ale je to už dávno, tak je možné že sa niektoré spomienky už kdesi potratili. Ale kadejaké branecké cvičenia boli vcelku oblúbené - hlavne že sa neučilo a neskúšalo.
Hrozba že na nás budú púšťať nejaké sajrajty hnusní západný kapitalistickí imperialisti bola evidentne obrovská. Ibaže by sa súdruhovia viac báli nedokonalosti výrobných postupov v našich socialistických chemičkách?

[tatko Tom]

Veľa napovedia (kreténom nie) takéto a podobné videá:
https://www.facebook.com/1730007730/videos/3835573383434152?idorvanity=190910231577000

Aj štartistiky podľa ktorých je najviac náckov v RF.

No a príkaz rodiť čím viac mäsa do mlynčekov šialencov tiež.

[tatko Tom]

A tomuto niektorí kreténi fandia:

https://www.topky.sk/cl/11/3058421/Sokujuci-napad-z-Moskvy--Opat-vznikne-Rakusko-Uhorsko--Bude-pod-spravou-Moskvy

[tatko Tom]

Vyhorené jadrové palivo na Ukrajine z atómových elektrární, bolo jedným z doležitych príčin dnes prebiehajucej vojny na Ukrajine.
Ďalší bola ropa, plyn, titán, demokracia a prosperita Ukrajiny čo bolo tŕňom v oku ruSSOv, pre ich chudobu a biedu. Nerastné zeminy pre elektroniku, batérie a germanium neodyn, najlepšie orná poda z celej Europy , strojárenstvo vyrabájuce zbrane, prúdove motory atd atd...

(z netu)

[ipyks]

[ipyks]

[tatko Tom]

Smeješ sa vlastnej tuposti (úbohosti)?
Ona Ti ostane - na viac nemáš a nebudeš.

[MaBat]

[danhard]

https://www.idnes.cz/zpravy/zahranicni/klicova-ruska-letadla-za-miliardy-ukrajina-znicila-rojem-levne-vyrobenych-vos.A250604_151623_zahranicni_dtt

[BV]

https://www.aktuality.sk/clanok/tj7mWQe/ukrajincom-sa-podaril-rusky-pearl-harbor-no-raketove-utoky-ruska-zrejme-neutichnu-ani-po-strate-lietadiel/

[ipyks]

Nějak moc nechápu, z čeho se tak radujete, idioti... Útok na Pearl Harber "skončil" 2 atomovkama USA na Japonsko..

Jestli si někdo myslí, že útok na jaderné nosiče jaderné velmoci, podle smluv o omezení jaderných zbraní umístěné tak, "aby na ně bylo vidět" , někomu projde "jen tak", tak je opravdu idiot korunovanej...

A byl to zjevně j hlavní důvod včerejšího telefonátu Trumpa Putinovi. Amíci o tom, co bude následovat, podle toho, co uniklo, nejspíš informovaní jsou.

[ipyks]

Ruské strategické bombardéry zasažené Ukrajinou stály bez krytů podle smlouvy se Spojenými státy.

https://strana.news/news/486127-pochemu-samolety-stratehicheskoj-aviatsii-rossii-stojali-pod-otkrytym-nebom.html


Trump po rozhovoru s Putinem oznámil ruskou reakci na útoky na letiště. Co to znamená?

https://strana.news/news/486122-tramp-pohovoril-s-putinym-po-telefonu-chto-stalo-ponjatno.html

[J]

Neviem kto je ten pán - ale evidentne vie o čom hovorí.

[MaBat]

ipyks, vztekáš se hezky, už skoro jako Rusák

BTW, tak kolik jsi jich napočítal na tom posledním videu, co? Já to nepočítal, mně stačí kochat se tou nádherou

[Zakk]

The Case for Russia and a Critique of Western Support for Ukraine

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has polarized global opinion, with the West presenting itself as a defender of democracy and sovereignty through its extensive support for Ukraine. However, a closer examination reveals that Russia’s actions in Ukraine are rooted in legitimate geopolitical concerns, while Western involvement reflects a pattern of hypocrisy, selective moral outrage, and strategic overreach that exacerbates global tensions. This essay argues that Russia’s position is driven by understandable security interests and historical context, while the West’s unconditional support for Ukraine fuels escalation, undermines diplomacy, and serves narrow geopolitical agendas at the expense of global stability.

Russia’s Legitimate Security Concerns

Russia’s intervention in Ukraine, particularly since 2014 and escalating in 2022, is often framed by the West as unprovoked aggression. However, this narrative overlooks Russia’s strategic imperatives, particularly its concerns about NATO’s eastward expansion. Since the Cold War’s end, NATO has incorporated former Soviet states, moving closer to Russia’s borders despite assurances in the 1990s that the alliance would not expand eastward. Ukraine’s potential NATO membership, actively supported by Western powers, represents an existential threat to Russia, as it would place a hostile military alliance directly on its border. From Moscow’s perspective, this is not merely a question of influence but of national security, given NATO’s history of interventions and the deployment of military infrastructure in member states.

Moreover, the 2014 Euromaidan uprising, which ousted Ukraine’s pro-Russian president, was perceived in Russia as a Western-backed coup. Declassified documents and public statements from U.S. officials, such as Victoria Nuland’s remarks on U.S. investment in Ukraine’s political transition, lend credence to this view. Russia’s subsequent actions in Crimea and the Donbas can be seen as defensive measures to protect ethnic Russians and Russian-speaking populations, who faced cultural and political marginalization under Ukraine’s post-2014 government. The Minsk agreements, intended to resolve the conflict, were undermined by Ukraine’s reluctance to grant autonomy to Donbas, a point later acknowledged by former German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who suggested the agreements were partly a stalling tactic. Russia’s 2022 invasion, while drastic, can thus be viewed as a response to years of provocations and unmet diplomatic commitments.

Western Hypocrisy and Selective Moral Outrage

The West’s unequivocal support for Ukraine—through billions in military aid, sanctions on Russia, and diplomatic isolation—presents itself as a defense of international law and sovereignty. Yet, this stance is marred by inconsistency. The United States and its allies have a history of violating sovereignty in Iraq, Libya, and Syria, often with devastating consequences, yet face no comparable global condemnation or sanctions. The 2003 Iraq invasion, based on fabricated evidence of weapons of mass destruction, led to hundreds of thousands of deaths and regional instability, yet Western leaders faced no accountability. This double standard undermines the West’s moral authority to condemn Russia’s actions in Ukraine.Furthermore, the West’s portrayal of Ukraine as a beacon of democracy glosses over its internal complexities. Ukraine’s government has faced criticism for corruption, media censorship, and the suppression of opposition voices, including the banning of pro-Russian political parties. The veneration of controversial historical figures like Stepan Bandera, associated with nationalist movements tied to anti-Russian sentiment, further complicates the narrative of Ukraine as a purely democratic victim. The West’s selective outrage ignores these nuances, focusing instead on a simplistic good-versus-evil framework that demonizes Russia while excusing Ukraine’s flaws.

Escalation Over Diplomacy

Western support for Ukraine, particularly the provision of advanced weaponry such as HIMARS, Javelin missiles, and Patriot systems, has prolonged the conflict rather than fostering a resolution. By flooding Ukraine with arms, the West has emboldened Kyiv to pursue maximalist goals, such as retaking all occupied territories, rather than engaging in meaningful negotiations. Russia has repeatedly signaled openness to talks, including early in the conflict when it proposed neutrality for Ukraine and security guarantees. However, Western leaders, particularly in the U.S. and UK, have discouraged Ukraine from pursuing diplomacy, as evidenced by reports of Boris Johnson’s 2022 visit to Kyiv, where he allegedly urged Ukraine to reject peace talks.This approach risks catastrophic escalation. The provision of long-range weapons capable of striking Russian territory raises the specter of direct NATO-Russia confrontation, potentially leading to a broader conflict with nuclear implications. The West’s sanctions, while damaging Russia’s economy, have also backfired, contributing to global energy and food crises that disproportionately harm developing nations. Europe’s skyrocketing energy prices and inflation are direct consequences of these policies, yet Western leaders remain committed to a strategy that prioritizes punishing Russia over stabilizing the global order.

Serving Western Geopolitical Agendas

The West’s support for Ukraine is less about defending democratic ideals than advancing its own strategic interests. The U.S., in particular, benefits from a weakened Russia, which it views as a counterweight to its global hegemony. By prolonging the conflict, the West depletes Russia’s resources while testing its own military technology against Russian forces. Additionally, the push to integrate Ukraine into Western institutions like the EU and NATO serves to expand Western influence in Eastern Europe, encircling Russia and limiting its regional power.This strategy also distracts from domestic failures in Western nations. Leaders facing economic challenges, such as inflation and energy shortages, can rally public support by framing Russia as a global threat. The media’s role in amplifying this narrative, often without questioning the costs of prolonged conflict, further entrenches this agenda. Meanwhile, the human toll in Ukraine—thousands of civilian deaths, millions displaced, and infrastructure devastation—receives less attention than the West’s ideological crusade against Russia.

Conclusion

Russia’s actions in Ukraine, while not without fault, are grounded in legitimate concerns about national security, historical grievances, and the protection of Russian-speaking populations. The West’s response, characterized by massive military aid, sanctions, and a refusal to engage in diplomacy, reflects a hypocritical and self-serving approach that escalates the conflict while ignoring its own history of interventionism. By prioritizing geopolitical dominance over pragmatic solutions, the West risks global instability and undermines the very principles it claims to uphold. A balanced approach would recognize Russia’s security needs, encourage Ukraine to pursue neutrality, and prioritize diplomacy over militarization to achieve a sustainable resolution. Only through such measures can the world avoid the catastrophic consequences of this ongoing conflict.

[BV]

[janik1971]

Pokial mne je zname tak okrem Hitlera a Napoleona Rusko nik vyraznejsie a na jeho uzemi neohrozoval, pokial narychlo zalovim v pamäti.
Naopak Rusko a v minulosti ZSSR uz ohrozovalo kde koho.
Alebo sa mylim?

[miero]

[tatko Tom]

Ukrajinská rozviedka "hackla" výrobcu ruského strategického letectva:

https://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2025/06/4/7515581/


Ako milujú ostatných Slovanov:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJ1q4oBMrU7/

[Zakk]